Our Editorial Mission
Local SEO is full of noise. We cut through it. We built Get Ranked in Map Pack because the industry drowns in untested theories and recycled forum gossip. Our mission is simple. We test tactics on live Google Business Profiles. We document the results. We publish the data.
You read what actually moves the needle in the local 3-pack. We serve agency owners, local business operators, and in-house marketers who need operational reality. Theory gets businesses suspended. We demand proof.
Every article we publish serves a single purpose. We want to help you build citation consistency, optimize your GBP Q&A section, and capture featured snippets. We do not publish generic marketing fluff. We deliver high-resolution, accurate data.
How We Choose Topics
We don’t guess what you want to read. We look at the friction points. We pull topics directly from client campaigns, algorithm turbulence, and the specific roadblocks you hit when optimizing for proximity signals.
If a new GBP feature rolls out, we test it. If review velocity suddenly drops across a specific vertical like HVAC or plumbing, we investigate. We monitor the exact problems local SEO practitioners face daily.
We ignore broad, theoretical concepts. We focus on NAP consistency audits, geo-grid tracking anomalies, and citation indexing failures. You need solutions for the actual problems breaking your map pack rankings.
Research and Fact-Checking Standards
Every claim on this site undergoes strict verification. We do not publish unverified algorithm rumors. When we state that a specific primary category change triggers a re-verification loop, it is because we watched it happen across multiple client accounts.
We cross-reference our findings with official Google documentation. We trust our own geo-grid data first. If we recommend a citation aggregator, we have personally tracked its indexing rate over a 90-day period.
Three years of testing. Zero shortcuts. Real results.
We reject hearsay entirely. If a tactic lacks empirical backing from live local campaigns, it does not make it onto our site. We require screenshots, ranking graphs, and verifiable case studies before we endorse any optimization technique.
Corrections Policy
We get things wrong. When we do, we fix them fast. Google updates its local search guidelines constantly. Sometimes our data becomes outdated. Sometimes we make an error.
If you spot a factual inaccuracy regarding map pack ranking factors, email our editorial team at [email protected]. We review all claims within 48 hours. We check the flagged issue against current live search results.
If a correction is warranted, we update the page immediately. We add a visible “Correction” note at the top of the article detailing what changed and when.
Transparency builds trust.
Affiliate and Commercial Relationships
Running local SEO campaigns requires software. Rank trackers, citation builders, review management platforms. We use them all. We pay for our own tools. We only recommend what survives our workflow.
Sometimes we use affiliate links when linking to these tools. This means we earn a small commission if you buy through our link. This never affects our editorial judgment.
We rejected 14 different review generation tools before finding one that actually integrates properly with current GBP API standards. If a tool fails our stress tests, we say so. We highlight the bugs, the terrible customer support, and the broken features.
Editorial Independence
Nobody buys a positive review on this site. Our editorial team operates completely separate from any advertising or affiliate partnerships. Software companies cannot pay us to feature their product in a “Top Local SEO Tools” list.
We do not accept sponsored guest posts. We do not sell links. Our loyalty belongs exclusively to our readers.
If a major local SEO platform pushes a bad update, we report on it. We protect our independence fiercely. You rely on our data to run your business, and we refuse to compromise that trust for a quick payout.
Content Updates
Stale local SEO advice is dangerous. What worked for map pack rankings two years ago will often get your profile suspended today. We keep our archives sharp.
We audit our entire content library every quarter. We flag articles covering volatile topics like keyword stuffing in business names or virtual office guidelines. We check every recommendation against the current algorithm behavior.
We update the copy, adjust the strategies, and log the update date at the top of the post. If a tactic completely dies, we rewrite the article to explain why it failed and what to do instead. You deserve a roadmap that actually reflects the current local search environment.